treachery and lies

I was reading a novel yesterday (The confessions of Max Tivoli) in which the main subject (an aging backwards old man who appears as a young boy) mentions something about the “outrageous lies” taught in elementary school and it reminded me of my own experience. If you went to public school in the USA, you were probably taught as a young child (1st or 2nd grade) about George Washington and the cherry tree. The gist of which is that George chopped down one of his father’s favorite cherry trees as a boy. When his father found out about the cherry tree and got mad, George immediately confessed. This was supposed to show how honest he was. It was repeated on a number of occasions in history classes (over several years), but at one point, in 4th or 5th grade, I somehow figured out it was not true (I know for sure at least one teacher confirmed this – she said it was a fable to teach a lesson). I was outraged – if grownups, teachers no less, would lie to students about something so inconsequential in the service of demonstrating honesty – what else were they lying about?

So it was at about 12 years old, I learned to distrust authority. I was lucky though because I don’t think most children understood the ramifications of this and it’s really no wonder that our government today is such a viper’s nest of corruption when our primary education is founded on such lies.

Another outrageous, but more consequential lie, was told to me in high school history class – the civil war was not about slavery, but about “state’s rights,” that is, the South tried to secede from the union because they wanted greater state’s rights (less federal power). And I went to high school in the north! I later learned that the civil war was definitely about slavery and the southern states were pissed about the northern states not enforcing the [federal] fugitive slave laws and returning all their escaped saves. For the Union (the North), the civil war may not have been strictly about slavery in the beginning (more about retaining power), but fo the South, it most definitely was. The whole state’s rights thing is “Lost Cause” mythology.
You can do your own research to verify these claims, but here are some links:

1. The Moral Washington: Construction of a Legend

2. Myth conceptions about the cause of the Civil War

The question is, if they lied to us about this (and the “weapons of mass destruction”), then what else? Maybe we need some better critical thinking in this country.

expiry for laws

Like politicians are given term limits, so too should the laws themselves have time limits. Laws are reflections of a culture’s widely held morals (and sometimes those just close to the politicians’ hearts) and any amateur sociologist knows that a culture’s morals evolve and change over time. For example, homosexuality is no longer considered a psychological disorder (at least not by the psychology profession – it’s off the DSM4). Like any packaged food, laws should have expiration dates. I think an average lifetime (70-80 years) would be best, but I’d settle for 100 years. Any law still worth having around could be renewed (i.e., murder should remain illegal), but laws not renewed should automatically be expired. It’s like having a home for many years and never dusting – keeping laws indefinitely is just a very messy proposition.

Some sample strange (and irrelevant) laws are here: Strange Laws

law is not your friend

How many laws do you think we have? Think local (your city/town, your county), state and federal. A few hundred thousand maybe? Enough to keep lawyers occupied in intensive study for 3 years in a specialty (not all laws, just laws about corporate finance or intellectual property), and even then, it’s unlikely that they’d know them all. As a regular citizen, it is your responsibility to follow all these laws… but you don’t even know 1/1000th of them!

This is one of the ways our political system is absurd. You can be arrested and jailed or fined for any number of actions that you have no clue are illegal. And it’s not like the laws are all sensible moral things like “don’t kill people”, but many are obscure things like “don’t keep cake in cookie jars” or “no sexual positions besides missionary allowed”, left over from puritanical control-freaks from centuries ago.

I think we all must be lawbreakers by now.  So revel in your outlawery – just don’t be mean.

appreciation for the system

The other day, I was thinking about our political system in the USA and I finally figured out a way to appreciate it. I abhor the whole democrat vs. republican faux-rivalry and I especially hate the vacuous “vote for change” campaigns, but now I realize that “change” is what makes it all tolerable. However bad it might get and however equally bad the new power might be, they’re continually forced to change tactics as people get wise to their old ways of rigging the system. So, yes, please do vote for change. Vote for no change, I don’t care, just keep this continually changing government afloat.

beloved flag